Discussion Sunny Vs Wahaby

Discussion about the nature of God between a madzhab Sunna (more easily we juluki si A) with one of the leaders Wahabi / Salafi (we juluki si B).
A Si mensucikan God's nature is not eligible for dzat God, as God is, God is jealous, God is comprised of parts of the body, face, 2 hands, 2 feet and with a variety of road trying to prove the error is confidence-confidence. However, they do not bring benefits.
A Si (madzhab Sunna) said on the B: If Allah. have these attributes, that is He has the face, has two hands, two legs, two eyes, and other attributes that they address their Lord, do not be a man and a vision and imagine him? And the man would imagine him. Because human lives are in such a way, so that he would conjure up something that has been given the nature of so and so. "
Si B (the Wahabi) said: "Yes, one can imagine him (of God), but he was not permitted to give tahukannya.!"
A Si ask again: "What is the difference between you putting an idol before you and then you menyembahnya with you only imagine an idol and then menyembahnya?".
Si B said: "This is a group of misguided hope that the word of God ruin them. They believe in Allah but they did not mensifati him with the attributes like this (have two hands, feet and others). So therefore, they worship God does not exist. "
A Si is said; "Allah the Most righteous, He can not be covered by intellect, can not be achieved by vision, can not be asked where and how, and can not be said to him why and how. Because He who has created the and how. Anything that you can not imagine that God, and everything you can imagine is being. We have learned from the scholars of the descendants of the Prophet saw. They said, 'everything you imagine, EVEN IF THE INVESTMENT the most sophisticated , something I think about it like you '. Overall knowledge of God is the mampuan know him. "
B say, with the full emotion, "We set up what has been set by God for Himself, and that it is enough!" Thus this brief discussion.
The Wahabi / Salafi attempt to give justification to the hadith-hadith about Tajsim / penjasmanian and Tasybih / penyerupaan with reason: "No form of (bi la kaif)"?